The citation effect: In-text citations moderately increase belief in trivia claims.

Citation data:

Acta psychologica, ISSN: 1873-6297, Vol: 179, Page: 114-123

Publication Year:
2017
Usage 98
Abstract Views 87
Link-outs 11
Captures 10
Readers 9
Exports-Saves 1
Social Media 202
Shares, Likes & Comments 164
Tweets 38
PMID:
28780441
DOI:
10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.07.010
Author(s):
Putnam, Adam L; Phelps, Riley J
Publisher(s):
Elsevier BV
Tags:
Psychology; Arts and Humanities
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
Authors use in-text citations to provide support for their claims and to acknowledge work done by others. How much do such citations increase the believability of an author's claims? It is possible that readers (especially novices) might ignore citations as they read. Alternatively, citations ostensibly serve as evidence for a claim, which justifies using them as a basis for a judgment of truth. In six experiments, subjects saw true and false trivia claims of varying difficulty presented with and without in-text citations (e.g., The cat is the only pet not mentioned in the bible) and rated the likelihood that each statement was true. A mini meta-analysis summarizing the results of all six experiments indicated that citations had a small but reliable effect on judgments of truth (d=0.13, 95% CI [0.06, 0.20]) suggesting that subjects were more likely to believe claims that were presented with citations than without. We discuss this citation effect and how it is similar and different to related research suggesting that nonprobative photos can increase judgments of truth.