Conservation social science: Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation

Citation data:

Biological Conservation, ISSN: 0006-3207, Vol: 205, Page: 93-108

Publication Year:
Usage 1768
Abstract Views 1694
Link-outs 74
Captures 571
Readers 563
Exports-Saves 8
Mentions 4
Blog Mentions 2
News Mentions 2
Social Media 1258
Tweets 781
Shares, Likes & Comments 477
Citations 20
Citation Indexes 20
Nathan J. Bennett, Sarah C. Klain, Kai Chan, Robin Roth, Patrick Christie, Douglas A. Clark, Georgina Cullman, Deborah Curran, Trevor J. Durbin, Graham Epstein, Alison Greenberg, Michael P. Nelson, John Sandlos, Richard Stedman, Tara L. Teel, Rebecca Thomas, Diogo Veríssimo, Carina Wyborn Show More Hide
Elsevier BV
Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Environmental Science
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
Most Recent Blog Mention
Most Recent News Mention
review description
It has long been claimed that a better understanding of human or social dimensions of environmental issues will improve conservation. The social sciences are one important means through which researchers and practitioners can attain that better understanding. Yet, a lack of awareness of the scope and uncertainty about the purpose of the conservation social sciences impedes the conservation community's effective engagement with the human dimensions. This paper examines the scope and purpose of eighteen subfields of classic, interdisciplinary and applied conservation social sciences and articulates ten distinct contributions that the social sciences can make to understanding and improving conservation. In brief, the conservation social sciences can be valuable to conservation for descriptive, diagnostic, disruptive, reflexive, generative, innovative, or instrumental reasons. This review and supporting materials provides a succinct yet comprehensive reference for conservation scientists and practitioners. We contend that the social sciences can help facilitate conservation policies, actions and outcomes that are more legitimate, salient, robust and effective.

This review has 0 Wikipedia reference.