Conservation social science: Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation

Citation data:

Biological Conservation, ISSN: 0006-3207, Vol: 205, Page: 93-108

Publication Year:
Usage 1816
Abstract Views 1694
Link-outs 74
Clicks 48
Captures 951
Readers 943
Exports-Saves 8
Social Media 1302
Tweets 816
Shares, Likes & Comments 486
Citations 56
Citation Indexes 56
Nathan J. Bennett; Sarah C. Klain; Kai Chan; Robin Roth; Patrick Christie; Douglas A. Clark; Georgina Cullman; Deborah Curran; Trevor J. Durbin; Graham Epstein; Alison Greenberg; Michael P. Nelson; John Sandlos; Richard Stedman; Tara L. Teel; Rebecca Thomas; Diogo Veríssimo; Carina Wyborn Show More Hide
Elsevier BV
Agricultural and Biological Sciences; Environmental Science
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
review description
It has long been claimed that a better understanding of human or social dimensions of environmental issues will improve conservation. The social sciences are one important means through which researchers and practitioners can attain that better understanding. Yet, a lack of awareness of the scope and uncertainty about the purpose of the conservation social sciences impedes the conservation community's effective engagement with the human dimensions. This paper examines the scope and purpose of eighteen subfields of classic, interdisciplinary and applied conservation social sciences and articulates ten distinct contributions that the social sciences can make to understanding and improving conservation. In brief, the conservation social sciences can be valuable to conservation for descriptive, diagnostic, disruptive, reflexive, generative, innovative, or instrumental reasons. This review and supporting materials provides a succinct yet comprehensive reference for conservation scientists and practitioners. We contend that the social sciences can help facilitate conservation policies, actions and outcomes that are more legitimate, salient, robust and effective.