Precarious manhood and muscularity: Effects of threatening men's masculinity on reported strength and muscle dissatisfaction.

Citation data:

Body image, ISSN: 1873-6807, Vol: 22, Page: 156-165

Publication Year:
2017
Usage 189
Abstract Views 127
Link-outs 62
Captures 25
Readers 19
Exports-Saves 6
Social Media 111
Shares, Likes & Comments 99
Tweets 12
Citations 1
Citation Indexes 1
PMID:
28802199
DOI:
10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.07.002
Author(s):
Frederick, David A; Shapiro, Lily M; Williams, Tonicia R; Seoane, Christiana M; McIntosh, Rachel T; Fischer, Emily W
Publisher(s):
Elsevier BV
Tags:
Psychology
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
The precarious manhood perspective proposes that men respond with aggression when they experience threats to their masculinity. Consistent with this view, we hypothesized that men would represent themselves as stronger and more formidable after their masculinity was threatened. A recent study, however, found that men reported less physical strength when threatened (Hunt, Gonsalkorale, & Murray, 2013). In the current two studies (Ns=193; 450), men were given false feedback about whether they were substantially less masculine (masculinity threatened) or more masculine than average (masculinity reassured). Men reported how much weight they could curl, how many push-ups they could complete, and/or measures of satisfaction with muscularity. In most analyses, threatened men reported greater strength than reassured men. Effects of masculinity threat on muscle dissatisfaction varied by outcome measure. The studies highlight the importance of replication studies, and of using experimental approaches to understand connections between precarious manhood and male body image.