The imprecisions of precision measures in process mining

Citation data:

Information Processing Letters, ISSN: 0020-0190, Vol: 135, Page: 1-8

Publication Year:
2018
Captures 25
Readers 25
Social Media 12
Tweets 12
Citations 2
Citation Indexes 2
DOI:
10.1016/j.ipl.2018.01.013
Author(s):
Niek Tax; Xixi Lu; Natalia Sidorova; Dirk Fahland; Wil M.P. van der Aalst
Publisher(s):
Elsevier BV
Tags:
Mathematics; Computer Science
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
In process mining, precision measures are used to quantify how much a process model overapproximates the behavior seen in an event log. Although several measures have been proposed throughout the years, no research has been done to validate whether these measures achieve the intended aim of quantifying over-approximation in a consistent way for all models and logs. This paper fills this gap by postulating a number of axioms for quantifying precision consistently for any log and any model. Further, we show through counter-examples that none of the existing measures consistently quantifies precision.