The marketplace of ideology: “Elective affinities” in political psychology and their implications for consumer behavior

Citation data:

Journal of Consumer Psychology, ISSN: 1057-7408, Vol: 27, Issue: 4, Page: 502-520

Publication Year:
2017
Usage 343
Abstract Views 304
Link-outs 39
Captures 33
Readers 24
Exports-Saves 9
Social Media 80
Shares, Likes & Comments 55
Tweets 25
Citations 6
Citation Indexes 6
DOI:
10.1016/j.jcps.2017.07.003
Author(s):
John T. Jost
Publisher(s):
Elsevier BV
Tags:
Psychology, Business, Management and Accounting
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
An abundance of research in political psychology demonstrates that leftists and rightists (or liberals and conservatives) diverge from one another in terms of: (a) personality characteristics; (b) cognitive processing styles; (c) motivational interests and concerns; (d) the prioritization of personal values; and (e) neurological structures and physiological functions. In this article, I summarize these findings and discuss some of their implications for persuasion, framing, and advertising; consumer choice, judgment, decision-making, and behavior; and customer satisfaction/dissatisfaction and politically motivated boycotts. I conclude that the theory and practice of consumer psychology will be enriched by taking into account ideological asymmetries and the ways in which human behavior both reflects and gives rise to left–right divergence in political orientation—not only in terms of beliefs, opinions, and values but also in terms of underlying psychological processes.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.