Academic in-group bias: An empirical examination of the link between author and journal affiliation

Citation data:

Journal of Informetrics, ISSN: 1751-1577, Vol: 12, Issue: 1, Page: 74-86

Publication Year:
2018
Social Media 239
Tweets 239
DOI:
10.1016/j.joi.2017.11.006
Author(s):
Yaniv Reingewertz, Carmela Lutmar
Publisher(s):
Elsevier BV
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
Do academic journals favor authors who share their institutional affiliation? To answer this question we examine citation counts, as a proxy for paper quality, for articles published in four leading international relations journals during the years 2000–2015. We compare citation counts for articles written by “in-group members” (authors affiliated with the journal’s publishing institution) versus “out-group members” (authors not affiliated with that institution). Articles written by in-group authors received 18% to 49% fewer Web of Science citations when published in their home journal (International Security or World Politics) vs. an unaffiliated journal, compared to out-group authors. These results are mainly driven by authors who received their PhDs from Harvard or MIT. The findings show evidence of a bias within some journals towards publishing papers by faculty from their home institution, at the expense of paper quality.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.