Does informal learning at work differ between temporary and permanent workers? Evidence from 20 OECD countries

Citation data:

Labour Economics, ISSN: 0927-5371, Vol: 55, Page: 18-40

Publication Year:
2018
Captures 21
Readers 21
Social Media 156
Shares, Likes & Comments 146
Tweets 10
DOI:
10.1016/j.labeco.2018.08.009
Author(s):
Maria Ferreira; Andries de Grip; Rolf van der Velden
Publisher(s):
Elsevier BV
Tags:
Economics, Econometrics and Finance; Business, Management and Accounting
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
This paper analyses the relationship between temporary employment and the intensity of on-the-job informal learning across 20 developed countries. Using microdata from the OECD's PIAAC survey, we estimate an instrumented endogenous switching regression model and find that temporary employees engage in on-the-job learning more intensively than their counterparts in permanent employment. We show that this higher intensity of informal learning does not substitute for temporary workers’ lower participation in formal training. Instead, both types of learning are complementary. Heterogeneous-effect analyses suggests that early career expectations of gaining a permanent contract could explain the higher informal learning investments of employees while in a temporary job.