Response to ‘Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems’

Citation data:

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, ISSN: 1364-0321, Vol: 92, Page: 834-847

Publication Year:
2018
Captures 256
Readers 256
Mentions 15
News Mentions 11
Blog Mentions 4
Social Media 848
Tweets 690
Shares, Likes & Comments 158
Citations 3
Citation Indexes 3
DOI:
10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.113
Author(s):
T. W. Brown; T. Bischof-Niemz; K. Blok; C. Breyer; H. Lund; B. V. Mathiesen
Publisher(s):
Elsevier BV
Tags:
Energy
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
Most Recent Blog Mention
Most Recent News Mention
article description
A recent article ‘Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems’ claims that many studies of 100% renewable electricity systems do not demonstrate sufficient technical feasibility, according to the criteria of the article's authors (henceforth ‘the authors’). Here we analyse the authors’ methodology and find it problematic. The feasibility criteria chosen by the authors are important, but are also easily addressed at low economic cost, while not affecting the main conclusions of the reviewed studies and certainly not affecting their technical feasibility. A more thorough review reveals that all of the issues have already been addressed in the engineering and modelling literature. Nuclear power, which the authors have evaluated positively elsewhere, faces other, genuine feasibility problems, such as the finiteness of uranium resources and a reliance on unproven technologies in the medium- to long-term. Energy systems based on renewables, on the other hand, are not only feasible, but already economically viable and decreasing in cost every year.