Paul Ricoeur's Surprising Take on Recognition

Citation data:

Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies, ISSN: 2156-7808, Vol: 2, Issue: 1, Page: 35-50

Publication Year:
2011
Usage 5430
Full Text Views 5428
Abstract Views 2
Captures 12
Readers 11
Exports-Saves 1
Repository URL:
http://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ricoeur/article/view/57
DOI:
10.5195/errs.2011.57
Author(s):
Laitinen, Arto ;
Publisher(s):
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh, Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies
Tags:
Philosophy, Paul Ricœur, Recognition, Attestation, Identity, Human Constants
article description
This essay examines Paul Ricœur’s views on recognition in his book The Course of Recognition. It highlights those aspects that are in some sense surprising, in relation to his previous publications and the general debates on Hegelian Anerkennung and the politics of recognition. After an overview of Ricœur’s book, the paper examines the meaning of “recognition” in Ricœur’s own proposal, in the dictionaries Ricœur uses, and in the contemporary debates. Then it takes a closer look at the ideas of recognition as identification and as “taking as true.” Then it turns to recognition (attestation) of oneself, in light of the distinction between human constants (and the question “What am I?”), and human variables (and the question “Who Am I?”). The last section concerns the dialectics of struggles for recognition and states of peace, and the internal relationship between the contents of a normative demand and what counts as satisfying the demand. 

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.