Meta-analysis of PECS with individuals with ASD: investigation of targeted versus non-targeted outcomes, participant characteristics, and implementation phase.

Citation data:

Research in developmental disabilities, ISSN: 1873-3379, Vol: 33, Issue: 2, Page: 406-18

Publication Year:
2012
Usage 9396
Abstract Views 7499
Downloads 1127
Link-outs 767
Full Text Views 3
Captures 587
Exports-Saves 489
Readers 98
Citations 51
Citation Indexes 51
Repository URL:
http://scholars.library.tamu.edu/vivo/display/n186252SE, http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/152915
PMID:
22119688
DOI:
10.1016/j.ridd.2011.09.023
Author(s):
Ganz, Jennifer B., Davis, John L., Lund, Emily M., Goodwyn, Fara D., Simpson, Richard L.
Publisher(s):
Elsevier BV
Tags:
Psychology, Autism spectrum disorder, augmentative and alternative communication, aided AAC, communication skills, social skills, interventions, meta-analysis, Picture Exchange Communication System
article description
The Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) is a widely used picture/icon aided augmentative communication system designed for learners with autism and other developmental disorders. This meta-analysis analyzes the extant empirical literature for PECS relative to targeted (functional communication) and non-targeted concomitant outcomes (behavior, social skills, and speech) for learners with autism, learners with autism and intellectual disabilities and those with autism and multiple disabilities. Effect size analyses were done using the Improvement Rate Difference method, an advanced metric. Effect sizes were independently analyzed for targeted and non-targeted outcomes, student age, learner disability, and number of phases in the PECS protocol acquired by learners. Results supported the judgment that PECS is a promising intervention method. Analysis also revealed that functional communication outcomes associated with the PECS protocol were most impacted, that preschool children and those with autism generally showed the strongest training effects, and that in general students who advanced through the most PECS protocol phases had the best outcomes.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.