Contingentism about individuals and higher-order necessitism

Citation data:

Theoria (Spain), ISSN: 0495-4548, Vol: 28, Issue: 3, Page: 393-406

Publication Year:
2013
Usage 161
Downloads 101
Abstract Views 48
HTML Views 7
PDF Views 3
Link-outs 2
Captures 9
Exports-Saves 5
Readers 4
Social Media 1
Tweets 1
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/10139
DOI:
10.1387/theoria.6882
Author(s):
Manuel Pérez Otero
Publisher(s):
Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea / Universidad del País Vasco
Tags:
Arts and Humanities
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
Necessitism about individuals claims that necessarily every individual necessarily exists. An analogous necessitist thesis attributes necessary existence to properties and relations. Both theses have been defended by Williamson. Furthermore, Williamson specifically argues against the hybrid conjunction of first-order contingentism (the negation of necessitism about individuals) and higher-order necessitism; a combination that would bring about additional drawbacks. I work out a defence of the hybrid combination, including some replies to Williamson's additional objections. Considerations of ontological parsimony and pretheoretical intuitions favour the hybrid view over necessitism at all orders (which Williamson mainly defends by invoking considerations of simplicity).

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.