The Forgotten Tradition: How the Logical Empiricists Missed the Philosophical Significance of the Work of Riemann, Christoffel and Ricci

Citation data:

Erkenntnis, ISSN: 0165-0106, Vol: 78, Issue: 6, Page: 1219-1257

Publication Year:
Usage 500
Downloads 470
Abstract Views 17
HTML Views 8
Link-outs 5
Captures 6
Readers 5
Exports-Saves 1
Social Media 1
Tweets 1
Citations 4
Citation Indexes 4
Repository URL:
Marco Giovanelli
Springer Nature, Springer (Springer Science+Business Media B.V.)
Arts and Humanities, Mathematics
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
This paper attempts to show how the logical empiricists' interpretation of the relation between geometry and reality emerges from a "collision" of mathematical traditions. Considering Riemann's work as the initiator of a 19th century geometrical tradition, whose main protagonists were Helmholtz and Poincaré, the logical empiricists neglected the fact that Riemann's revolutionary insight flourished instead in a non-geometrical tradition dominated by the works of Christoffel and Ricci-Curbastro roughly in the same years. I will argue that, in the attempt to interpret general relativity as the last link of the chain Riemann-Helmholtz-Poincaré-Einstein, logical empiricists were led to argue that Einstein's theory of gravitation mainly raised a problem of mathematical under-determination, i.e. the discovery that there are physical differences that cannot be expressed in the relevant mathematical structure of the theory. However, a historical reconstruction of the alternative Riemann-Christoffel-Ricci-Einstein line of evolution shows on the contrary that the main philosophical issue raised by Einstein's theory was instead that of mathematical over-determination, i.e. the recognition of the presence of redundant mathematical differences that do not have any correspondence in physical reality. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.