Kitcher on well-ordered science: Should science be measured against the outcomes of ideal democratic deliberation?

Citation data:

Theoria (Spain), ISSN: 0495-4548, Vol: 28, Issue: 2, Page: 233-244

Publication Year:
2013
Usage 290
Downloads 176
Abstract Views 56
HTML Views 31
PDF Views 24
Link-outs 3
Captures 14
Readers 12
Exports-Saves 2
Citations 1
Citation Indexes 1
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/10172
DOI:
10.1387/theoria.6590
Author(s):
Arnon Keren
Publisher(s):
Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea / Universidad del PaĆ­s Vasco
Tags:
Arts and Humanities
article description
What should the goals of scientific inquiry be? What questions should scientists investigate, and how should our resources be distributed between different lines of investigation? Philip Kitcher has suggested that we should answer these questions by appealing to an ideal based on the consideration of hypothetical democratic deliberations under ideal circumstances. This paper examines possible arguments that might support acceptance of this ideal for science, and argues that neither the arguments presented by Kitcher (2001, 2011b) nor traditional arguments for democracy succeed in justifying its acceptance.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.