The governance of «well-ordered science», from ideal conversation to public debate

Citation data:

Theoria (Spain), ISSN: 0495-4548, Vol: 28, Issue: 2, Page: 245-256

Publication Year:
2013
Usage 315
Downloads 156
Abstract Views 111
PDF Views 37
HTML Views 11
Captures 9
Exports-Saves 7
Readers 2
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/10173
DOI:
10.1387/theoria.6498
Author(s):
Maxence Gaillard
Publisher(s):
Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea / Universidad del País Vasco
Tags:
Arts and Humanities
article description
In Science, Truth and Democracy (2001) and Science in a Democratic Society (2011a), Philip Kitcher proposed a model of "well-ordered science". Through the development of a philosophical ideal, Kitcher5s well-ordered science aims to consolidate the requirements of both democracy and scientific practice. This paper is an attempt to follow this ideal model in a more empirical perspective: how far can we use such a theory in the realms of scientific policy and institutional frameworks? The focus is put on a case study of a public debate on nanotechnology which took place in France.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.