Fara’s Formula and the Supervaluational Thin Red Line

Citation data:

THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, ISSN: 0495-4548, Vol: 28, Issue: 2, Page: 267-282

Publication Year:
2013
Usage 235
Downloads 143
Abstract Views 77
Full Text Views 13
Link-outs 2
Captures 10
Exports-Saves 10
Social Media 7
Shares, Likes & Comments 7
Citations 1
Citation Indexes 1
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/10175
DOI:
10.1387/theoria.4619
Author(s):
Alex Peter Malpass
Publisher(s):
UPV/EHU Press; Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea / Universidad del País Vasco
Tags:
Arts and Humanities
article description
The focus of this paper is an argument presented by Fara (2010), which is against supervaluatiomsm in the context of vagueness. I show how it applies equally to the branching-time (BT) supervaluationism (first presented in Thomason 1970), but not to the closely related 'STRL' semantics of Malpass & Wawer (2012).