El debate sobre el cambio climático interpretado como un juego de persuasión

Citation data:

THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, ISSN: 0495-4548, Vol: 28, Issue: 1, Page: 77-96

Publication Year:
Usage 753
Abstract Views 320
Full Text Views 217
Downloads 199
Link-outs 17
Captures 58
Exports-Saves 57
Readers 1
Social Media 19
Shares, Likes & Comments 17
Tweets 2
Repository URL:
Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla; Leonardo Monzonis Forner
UPV/EHU Press; Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea / Universidad del País Vasco
Arts and Humanities
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
Scientists try to persuade their colleagues, and ultimately the whole society, of the acceptability of their claims, discoveries and proposals. In order to reach that goal, they develop a number of strategies that can be studied as a 'game of persuasion', in which, besides the processes of formal and informal argumentation typically studied by logic and methodology of science, there are also 'sociological' aspects intervening. This paper analyses the debate on climate change science as a 'persuasion game', from an inferentialist point of view, according to the lines of a Zamora Bonilla (2006a).