The climate change debate as a persuasion game

Citation data:

Theoria (Spain), ISSN: 0495-4548, Vol: 28, Issue: 1, Page: 77-96

Publication Year:
2013
Usage 749
Abstract Views 320
Full Text Views 217
Downloads 195
Link-outs 17
Captures 58
Exports-Saves 57
Readers 1
Social Media 19
Shares, Likes & Comments 17
Tweets 2
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/10189
DOI:
10.1387/theoria.3412
Author(s):
Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla, Leonardo Monzonis Forner
Publisher(s):
Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea / Universidad del País Vasco
Tags:
Arts and Humanities
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
Scientists try to persuade their colleagues, and ultimately the whole society, of the acceptability of their claims, discoveries and proposals. In order to reach that goal, they develop a number of strategies that can be studied as a 'game of persuasion', in which, besides the processes of formal and informal argumentation typically studied by logic and methodology of science, there are also 'sociological' aspects intervening. This paper analyses the debate on climate change science as a 'persuasion game', from an inferentialist point of view, according to the lines of a Zamora Bonilla (2006a).

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.