Philosophical Elements in Thomas Kuhn's Historiography of Science

Citation data:

THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, ISSN: 0495-4548, Vol: 27, Issue: 3, Page: 281-292

Publication Year:
2012
Usage 790
Abstract Views 279
Downloads 206
HTML Views 157
PDF Views 130
Link-outs 18
Captures 34
Exports-Saves 19
Readers 15
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/10195
DOI:
10.1387/theoria.6160
Author(s):
Paul Hoyningen-Huene
Publisher(s):
Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea / Universidad del País Vasco
article description
To begin, the so-called ‘selectivity of historical judgment’ is discussed. According to it, writing history requires a comparative criterion of historical relevance. This criterion contains philosophical elements. In Kuhn’s case, the criterion directs historical research and presentation away from Whiggish historiography by postulating a hermeneutic reading of historical sources. This postulate implies some sort of internalism, some sort of rationality of scientific development, and historical realism. To conclude, some consequences of Kuhn’s anti-Whiggism are discussed. Para empezar, se discute la llamada “selectividad del juicio histórico”. De acuerdo con ello, escribir historia requiere un criterio comparativo de relevancia histórica. Este criterio contiene elementos filosóficos. En el caso de Kuhn, el criterio aleja la investigación y la presentación histórica de la historiografía Whig al postular una lectura hermenéutica de las fuentes históricas. Este postulado implica alguna clase de internismo, de racionalidad del desarrollo científico y realismo histórico. Para concluir, se discuten algunas consecuencias de la postura anti-Whig de Kuhn.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.