Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/10488
DOI:
10.1387/theoria.575
Author(s):
Romo, José
Publisher(s):
Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea / Universidad del País Vasco
article description
Peter Dear ha proporcionado recientemente un análisis de la transformación que sufrió el recurso a la experiencia en la filosofía natural del siglo XVII. De la experiencia de lo cotidiano se pasa a la descripción detallada de una experiencia artificial irrepetible, localizada espacio-temporalmente y producida por instrumentos más o menos complejos. El artículo explora dicha interpretación en referencia a la construcción de la ciencia del movimiento de Galileo, mediante un análisis del experimento del plano inclinado que se describe en los Discorsi y un manuscrito, y concluye que la interpretación de Dear dificulta considerablemente la caracterización de la práctica de Galileo. Peter Dear has recently put forward an analysis of the transformation underwent by the appeal to experience in Seventeenth-Century natural philosophy. According to Dear, this transformation lies in the change from common experience to the detailed description of an unrepeatable artificial experience space temporally located and produced by more or less sophisticated instruments. This paper explores Dear’s interpretation with regard to the construction of Galileo’s science of motion, by analyzing the celebrated inclined plane experiment described in the Discorsi as well as one of Galileo’s manuscripts and concludes that Dear’s interpretation makes very difficult the characterization of Galileo’s practice.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.