Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/10529
DOI:
10.1387/theoria.421
Author(s):
Jané, Ignacio
Publisher(s):
Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea / Universidad del País Vasco
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
Tarski's definition of logical consequence can take different forms when implemented in second order languages, depending on what counts as a model. In the canonical, or standard, version, a model is just an ordinary structure and the (monadic) second-order variables are meant to range over all subsets of its domain. We discuss the dependence of canonical second-order consequence on set theory and raise doubts on the assumption that canonical consequence is a definite relation.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.