Constructive Empiricism: Normative or Descriptive?
- Publication Year:
- Usage 382
- Downloads 382
- PhilSci-Archive 382
- Repository URL:
- Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
In this paper, I argue that Constructive Empiricism (CE) is ambiguous between two interpretations: CE as a normative epistemology of science and CE as a descriptive philosophy of science. When they present CE, constructive empiricists write as if CE is supposed to be more than a normative epistemology of science and that it is meant to be responsible to actual scientific practices. However, when they respond to objections, constructive empiricists fall back on a strictly normative interpretation of CE. This ambiguity seems to make CE immune to objections in a rather ad hoc fashion.