Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/1061
Author(s):
Karen Merikangas Darling
preprint description
This paper addresses a central interpretive problem in understanding Pierre Duhem`s philosophy of science. The problem arises because there is textual support for both realist and antirealist readings of his work. I argue that his realist and antirealist claims are different. For Duhem, scientific reasoning leads straight to antirealism. But intuition (reasons of the heart) motivates, without justifying, a kind of realism. I develop this idea to suggest a motivational realist interpretation of Duhem`s philosophy.

This preprint has 0 Wikipedia mention.