Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and rational choice under risk or uncertainty.

Citation data:

Journal of medical ethics, ISSN: 1473-4257, Vol: 40, Issue: 11, Page: 774-8

Publication Year:
2014
Usage 835
Abstract Views 407
Downloads 240
Link-outs 100
HTML Views 88
Captures 32
Exports-Saves 31
Readers 1
Social Media 4
Tweets 4
Citations 8
Citation Indexes 8
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/10754
PMID:
24835332
DOI:
10.1136/medethics-2013-101470
Author(s):
Zuradzki, Tomasz
Publisher(s):
BMJ
Tags:
Medicine, Social Sciences, Nursing, Arts and Humanities
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
In this paper I present an argument in favour of a parental duty to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). I argue that if embryos created in vitro were able to decide for themselves in a rational manner, they would sometimes choose PGD as a method of selection. Couples, therefore, should respect their hypothetical choices on a principle similar to that of patient autonomy. My thesis shows that no matter which moral doctrine couples subscribe to, they ought to conduct the PGD procedure in the situations when it is impossible to implant all of the created embryos and if there is a significant risk for giving birth to a child with a serious condition.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.