Technology and Epistemic Possibility

Citation data:

Journal for General Philosophy of Science, ISSN: 0925-4560, Vol: 44, Issue: 2, Page: 319-336

Publication Year:
Usage 337
Downloads 191
Abstract Views 101
HTML Views 43
Link-outs 2
Captures 16
Exports-Saves 12
Readers 4
Social Media 51
Shares, Likes & Comments 50
Tweets 1
Citations 2
Citation Indexes 2
Repository URL:
Isaac Record
Springer Nature
Arts and Humanities, Social Sciences
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
My aim in this paper is to give a philosophical analysis of the relationship between contingently available technology and the knowledge that it makes possible. My concern is with what specific subjects can know in practice, given their particular conditions, especially available technology, rather than what can be known "in principle" by a hypothetical entity like Laplace's Demon. The argument has two parts. In the first, I'll construct a novel account of epistemic possibility that incorporates two pragmatic conditions: responsibility and practicability. For example, whether subjects can gain knowledge depends in some circumstances on whether they have the capability of gathering relevant evidence. In turn, the possibility of undertaking such investigative activities depends in part on factors like ethical constraints, economical realities, and available technology. In the second part of the paper, I'll introduce "technological possibility" to analyze the set of actions made possible by available technology. To help motivate the problem and later test my proposal, I'll focus on a specific historical case, one of the earliest uses of digital electronic computers in a scientific investigation. I conclude that the epistemic possibility of gaining access to scientific knowledge about certain subjects depends (in some cases) on the technological possibility for making responsible investigations. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.