Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/10992
Author(s):
Ahmed, Arif, Caulton, Adam
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
preprint description
The paper argues that on three out of eight possible hypotheses about the EPR experiment we can construct novel and realistic decision problems on which (a) Causal Decision Theory and Evidential Decision Theory conflict (b) Causal Decision Theory and the EPR statistics conflict. We infer that anyone who fully accepts any of these three hypotheses has strong reasons to reject causal Decision Theory. Finally, we extend the original construction to show that anyone who gives any of the three hypotheses any non-zero credence has strong reasons to reject Causal Decision Theory. However, we concede that no version of the Many Worlds Interpretation (Vaidman 2014) gives rise to the conflicts that we point out.

This preprint has 0 Wikipedia mention.