Experiment and theory building

Citation data:

Synthese, ISSN: 0039-7857, Vol: 184, Issue: 3, Page: 235-246

Publication Year:
Usage 314
Downloads 154
Abstract Views 135
PDF Views 11
Link-outs 9
HTML Views 5
Captures 8
Exports-Saves 5
Readers 3
Social Media 1
Tweets 1
Citations 2
Citation Indexes 2
Repository URL:
Lydia Patton
Springer Nature
Arts and Humanities, Social Sciences
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
I examine the role of inference from experiment in theory building. What are the options open to the scientific community when faced with an experimental result that appears to be in conflict with accepted theory? I distinguish, in Laudan's (1977), Nickels's (1981), and Franklin's (1993) sense, between the context of pursuit and the context of justification of a scientific theory. Making this distinction allows for a productive middle position between epistemic realism and constructivism. The decision to pursue a new or a revised theory in response to the new evidence may not be fully rationally determined. Nonetheless, it is possible to distinguish the question of whether there is reason to pursue a theory from the question of whether that theory, once it has been pursued over time, solves a problem of interest to science. I argue that, in this context, there is a solid way to distinguish between the contexts of pursuit and of justification, on the basis of a theory's evidential support and problem-solving ability. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.