When one model is not enough: combining epistemic tools in systems biology.

Citation data:

Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences, ISSN: 1879-2499, Vol: 44, Issue: 2, Page: 170-80

Publication Year:
2013
Usage 329
Downloads 252
Abstract Views 67
Link-outs 10
Captures 38
Readers 36
Exports-Saves 2
Social Media 21
Shares, Likes & Comments 18
Tweets 3
Citations 10
Citation Indexes 10
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/11030
PMID:
23578487
DOI:
10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.03.012
Author(s):
Green, Sara
Publisher(s):
Elsevier BV
Tags:
Medicine, Arts and Humanities
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
In recent years, the philosophical focus of the modeling literature has shifted from descriptions of general properties of models to an interest in different model functions. It has been argued that the diversity of models and their correspondingly different epistemic goals are important for developing intelligible scientific theories (Leonelli, 2007; Levins, 2006). However, more knowledge is needed on how a combination of different epistemic means can generate and stabilize new entities in science. This paper will draw on Rheinberger's practice-oriented account of knowledge production. The conceptual repertoire of Rheinberger's historical epistemology offers important insights for an analysis of the modelling practice. I illustrate this with a case study on network modeling in systems biology where engineering approaches are applied to the study of biological systems. I shall argue that the use of multiple representational means is an essential part of the dynamic of knowledge generation. It is because of-rather than in spite of-the diversity of constraints of different models that the interlocking use of different epistemic means creates a potential for knowledge production.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.