A new direction for science and values

Citation data:

Synthese, ISSN: 0039-7857, Vol: 191, Issue: 14, Page: 3271-3295

Publication Year:
2014
Usage 314
Downloads 209
Abstract Views 64
Link-outs 28
Full Text Views 13
Captures 2
Exports-Saves 2
Social Media 41
Shares, Likes & Comments 38
Tweets 3
Citations 7
Citation Indexes 7
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/11036
DOI:
10.1007/s11229-014-0447-9
Author(s):
Daniel J. Hicks
Publisher(s):
Springer Nature, Springer (Springer Science+Business Media B.V.)
Tags:
Arts and Humanities, Social Sciences
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
The controversy over the old ideal of "value-free science" has cooled significantly over the past decade. Many philosophers of science now agree that even ethical and political values may play a substantial role in all aspects of scientific inquiry. Consequently, in the last few years, work in science and values has become more specific: Which values may influence science, and in which ways? Or, how do we distinguish illegitimate from illegitimate kinds of influence? In this paper, I argue that this problem requires philosophers of science to take a new direction. I present two case studies in the influence of values on scientific inquiry: feminist values in archaeology and commercial values in pharmaceutical research. I offer a preliminary assessment of these cases, that the influence of values was legitimate in the feminist case, but not in the pharmaceutical case. I then turn to three major approaches to distinguish legitimate from illegitimate influences of values, including the distinction between epistemic and non-epistemic values and Heather Douglas' distinction between direct and indirect roles for values. I argue that none of these three approaches gives an adequate analysis of the two cases. In the concluding section, I briefly sketch my own approach, which draws more heavily on ethics than the others, and is more promising as a solution to the current problem. This is the new direction in which I think science and values should move. © 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.