Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/11090
Author(s):
Samuel Schindler
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
preprint description
In this paper I defend Kuhn’s view of scientific discovery, which involves two central tenets, namely (i) that a scientific discovery always requires a discovery-that (i.e., the observation of X) and a discovery-what (i.e., the correct conceptualisation of X), and (ii) that there are two kinds of scientific discovery, resulting from the temporal order of the discovery-that and the discovery-what. I identify two problems with Kuhn’s account and offer solutions to them from a realist stance. Alternatives to Kuhn’s account are also discussed.

This preprint has 0 Wikipedia mention.