What makes biological organisation teleological?

Citation data:

Synthese, ISSN: 0039-7857, Vol: 194, Issue: 4, Page: 1089-1114

Publication Year:
Usage 590
Downloads 546
Abstract Views 44
Captures 12
Readers 12
Social Media 59
Shares, Likes & Comments 56
Tweets 3
Citations 5
Citation Indexes 5
Repository URL:
Matteo Mossio, Leonardo Bich, Mossio, M., Bich, L.
Springer Nature, Springer (Springer Science+Business Media B.V.)
Arts and Humanities, Social Sciences
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
This paper argues that biological organisation can be legitimately conceived of as an intrinsically teleological causal regime. The core of the argument consists in establishing a connection between organisation and teleology through the concept of self-determination: biological organisation determines itself in the sense that the effects of its activity contribute to determine its own conditions of existence. We suggest that not any kind of circular regime realises self-determination, which should be specifically understood as self-constraint: in biological systems, in particular, self-constraint takes the form of closure, i.e. a network of mutually dependent constitutive constraints. We then explore the occurrence of intrinsic teleology in the biological domain and beyond. On the one hand, the organisational account might possibly concede that supra-organismal biological systems (as symbioses or ecosystems) could realise closure, and hence be teleological. On the other hand, the realisation of closure beyond the biological realm appears to be highly unlikely. In turn, the occurrence of simpler forms of self-determination remains a controversial issue, in particular with respect to the case of self-organising dissipative systems.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.