Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/11168
Author(s):
Casini, Lorenzo
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
conference paper description
Mechanisms are usually viewed as hierarchical, with lower levels of a mechanism influencing, and decomposing, its higher-level behaviour. In order to adequately draw quantitative predictions from a model of a mechanism, the model needs to capture this hierarchical aspect. The recursive Bayesian network (RBN) formalism was put forward as a means to model mechanistic hierarchies (Casini et al., 2011) by decomposing variables into their constituting causal networks. The proposal was criticized by Gebharter (2014). He proposes an alternative formalism, which decomposes arrows. Here, I defend RBNs from the criticism and argue that they offer a better representation of mechanistic hierarchies than the rival account.

This conference paper has 0 Wikipedia mention.