Moral uncertainty in bioethical argumentation: a new understanding of the pro-life view on early human embryos.

Citation data:

Theoretical medicine and bioethics, ISSN: 1573-0980, Vol: 35, Issue: 6, Page: 441-57

Publication Year:
2014
Usage 651
Abstract Views 280
Downloads 220
Link-outs 134
HTML Views 11
Clicks 6
Captures 25
Exports-Saves 16
Readers 9
Social Media 3
Tweets 3
Citations 7
Citation Indexes 7
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/11191
PMID:
25230689
DOI:
10.1007/s11017-014-9309-1
PMCID:
4244577, PMC4244577
Author(s):
┼╗uradzki, Tomasz
Publisher(s):
Springer Nature, Springer
Tags:
Nursing, Medicine
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
In this article, I present a new interpretation of the pro-life view on the status of early human embryos. In my understanding, this position is based not on presumptions about the ontological status of embryos and their developmental capabilities but on the specific criteria of rational decisions under uncertainty and on a cautious response to the ambiguous status of embryos. This view, which uses the decision theory model of moral reasoning, promises to reconcile the uncertainty about the ontological status of embryos with the certainty about normative obligations. I will demonstrate that my interpretation of the pro-life view, although seeming to be stronger than the standard one, has limited scope and cannot be used to limit destructive research on human embryos.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.