The Bayesian who knew too much

Citation data:

Synthese, ISSN: 0039-7857, Vol: 192, Issue: 5, Page: 1527-1542

Publication Year:
2015
Usage 209
Downloads 199
Abstract Views 7
HTML Views 3
Captures 17
Readers 16
Exports-Saves 1
Social Media 3
Tweets 3
Citations 1
Citation Indexes 1
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/11232
DOI:
10.1007/s11229-014-0647-3
Author(s):
Yann Benétreau-Dupin
Publisher(s):
Springer Nature, Springer (Springer Science+Business Media B.V.)
Tags:
Arts and Humanities, Social Sciences
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
In several papers, John Norton has argued that Bayesianism cannot handle ignorance adequately due to its inability to distinguish between neutral and disconfirming evidence. He argued that this inability sows confusion in, e.g., anthropic reasoning in cosmology or the Doomsday argument, by allowing one to draw unwarranted conclusions from a lack of knowledge. Norton has suggested criteria for a candidate for representation of neutral support. Imprecise credences (families of credal probability functions) constitute a Bayesian-friendly framework that allows us to avoid inadequate neutral priors and better handle ignorance. The imprecise model generally agrees with Norton’s representation of ignorance but requires that his criterion of self-duality be reformulated or abandoned.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.