Methodological Individualism and Holism in Political Science: A Reconciliation

Citation data:

American Political Science Review, ISSN: 0003-0554, Vol: 107, Issue: 04, Page: 629-643

Publication Year:
2013
Usage 824
Abstract Views 380
Downloads 350
Link-outs 94
Captures 129
Readers 114
Exports-Saves 15
Social Media 14
Shares, Likes & Comments 13
Tweets 1
Citations 26
Citation Indexes 26
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/11343
DOI:
10.1017/s0003055413000373
Author(s):
CHRISTIAN LIST, KAI SPIEKERMANN
Publisher(s):
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Tags:
Social Sciences
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
Political science is divided between methodological individualists, who seek to explain political phenomena by reference to individuals and their interactions, and holists (or nonreductionists), who consider some higher-level social entities or properties such as states, institutions, or cultures ontologically or causally significant. We propose a reconciliation between these two perspectives, building on related work in philosophy. After laying out a taxonomy of different variants of each view, we observe that (i) although political phenomena result from underlying individual attitudes and behavior, individual-level descriptions do not always capture all explanatorily salient properties, and (ii) nonreductionistic explanations are mandated when social regularities are robust to changes in their individual-level realization. We characterize the dividing line between phenomena requiring nonreductionistic explanation and phenomena permitting individualistic explanation and give examples from the study of ethnic conflicts, social-network theory, and international-relations theory. © 2013 American Political Science Association.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.