Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/11346
Author(s):
Sebastian Lutz
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
preprint description
The debate between critics of syntactic and semantic approaches to the formalization of scientific theories has been going on for over 40 years. I review the debate in light of a recent exchange between Hans Halvorson, Clark Glymour, and Bas van Fraassen and argue that the only remaining disagreement concerns the alleged difference in the language dependence of syntactic and semantic approaches. This difference turns out to be illusory.

This preprint has 0 Wikipedia mention.