Reasons for (prior) belief in Bayesian epistemology

Citation data:

Synthese, ISSN: 0039-7857, Vol: 190, Issue: 5, Page: 787-808

Publication Year:
Usage 198
Downloads 169
Abstract Views 22
HTML Views 5
PDF Views 1
Link-outs 1
Captures 38
Readers 33
Exports-Saves 5
Social Media 5
Tweets 5
Citations 2
Citation Indexes 2
Repository URL:
Franz Dietrich, Christian List
Springer Nature, 2013
Arts and Humanities, Social Sciences
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
Bayesian epistemology tells us with great precision how we should move from prior to posterior beliefs in light of new evidence or information, but says little about where our prior beliefs come from. It offers few resources to describe some prior beliefs as rational or well-justified, and others as irrational or unreasonable. A different strand of epistemology takes the central epistemological question to be not how to change one's beliefs in light of new evidence, but what reasons justify a given set of beliefs in the first place. We offer an account of rational belief formation that closes some of the gap between Bayesianism and its reason-based alternative, formalizing the idea that an agent can have reasons for his or her (prior) beliefs, in addition to evidence or information in the ordinary Bayesian sense. Our analysis of reasons for belief is part of a larger programme of research on the role of reasons in rational agency (Dietrich and List, Nous, 2012a, in press; Int J Game Theory, 2012b, in press). © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.