Reference in the Land of the Rising Sun: A Cross-cultural Study on the Reference of Proper Names

Citation data:

Review of Philosophy and Psychology, ISSN: 1878-5158, Vol: 6, Issue: 2, Page: 213-230

Publication Year:
2015
Usage 214
Downloads 170
Abstract Views 36
Link-outs 8
Captures 4
Exports-Saves 2
Readers 2
Social Media 69
Shares, Likes & Comments 47
Tweets 22
Citations 5
Citation Indexes 5
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/11466
DOI:
10.1007/s13164-014-0206-3
Author(s):
Justin Sytsma, Jonathan Livengood, Ryoji Sato, Mineki Oguchi
Publisher(s):
Springer Nature
Tags:
Arts and Humanities, Psychology
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
A standard methodology in philosophy of language is to use intuitions as evidence. Machery, Mallon, Nichols, and Stich (2004) challenged this methodology with respect to theories of reference by presenting empirical evidence that intuitions about one prominent example from the literature on the reference of proper names (Kripke’s Gödel case) vary between Westerners and East Asians. In response, Sytsma and Livengood (2011) conducted experiments to show that the questions Machery and colleagues asked participants in their study were ambiguous, and that this ambiguity affected the responses given by Westerners. Sytsma and Livengood took their results to cast doubt on the claim that the current evidence indicates that there is cross-cultural variation in intuitions about the Gödel case. In this paper we report on a new cross-cultural study showing that variation in intuitions remains even after controlling for the ambiguity noted by Sytsma and Livengood.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.