A Critical Engagement of Bostrom’s Computer Simulation Hypothesis

Publication Year:
Usage 1340
Downloads 1340
Social Media 4
Shares, Likes & Comments 3
Tweets 1
Repository URL:
Swazo, Norman
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
preprint description
In 2003, philosopher Nick Bostrom presented the provocative idea that we are now living in a computer simulation. Although his argument is structured to include a “hypothesis,” it is unclear that his proposition can be accounted as a properly scientific hypothesis. Here Bostrom’s argument is engaged critically by accounting for philosophical and scientific positions that have implications for Bostrom’s principal thesis. These include discussions from Heidegger, Einstein, Heisenberg, Feynman, and Dreyfus that relate to modelling of structures of thinking and computation. In consequence of this accounting, given that there seems to be no reasonably admissible evidence to count for the task of falsification, one concludes that the computer simulation argument’s hypothesis is only speculative and not scientific.