Michelangelo's Stone: an Argument against Platonism in Mathematics
- Publication Year:
- Usage 307
- Downloads 307
- PhilSci-Archive 307
- Repository URL:
- Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
If there is a “platonic world” M of mathematical facts, what does M contain precisely? I observe that if M is too large, it is uninteresting, because the value is in the selection, not in the totality; if it is smaller and interesting, it is not independent from us. Both alternatives challenge mathe- matical platonism. I suggest that the universality of our mathematics may be a prejudice hiding its contingency, and illustrate contingent aspects of classical geometry, arithmetics and linear algebra.