Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/11687
Author(s):
Bryan W. Roberts
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
preprint description
Jim Weatherall has suggested that Einstein's hole argument, as presented by Earman and Norton (1987), is based on a misleading use of mathematics. I argue on the contrary that Weatherall demands an implausible restriction on how mathematics is used. The hole argument, on the other hand, is in no new danger at all.

This preprint has 0 Wikipedia mention.