Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/11742
Author(s):
Juha Saatsi
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
preprint description
I review prominent historical arguments against scientific realism to indicate how they display a systematic overshooting in the conclusions drawn from the historical evidence. The root of the overshooting can be located in some critical, undue presuppositions regarding realism. I will highlight these presuppositions in connection with both Laudan's 'Old induction' and Stanford's New Induction, and then delineate a minimal realist view that does without the problematic presuppositions.

This preprint has 0 Wikipedia mention.