Against Lawton’s Contingency Thesis; or, Why the Reported Demise of Community Ecology Is Greatly Exaggerated

Citation data:

Philosophy of Science, ISSN: 0031-8248, Vol: 82, Issue: 5, Page: 1104-1115

Publication Year:
2015
Usage 206
Downloads 152
Abstract Views 42
Full Text Views 11
Link-outs 1
Captures 6
Readers 5
Exports-Saves 1
Citations 3
Citation Indexes 3
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/11845
DOI:
10.1086/684024
Author(s):
Linquist, Stefan
Publisher(s):
University of Chicago Press
Tags:
Arts and Humanities
article description
Lawton’s contingency thesis (CT) states that there are no useful generalizations (“laws”) at the level of ecological communities because these systems are especially prone to contingent historical events. I argue that this influential thesis has been grounded on the wrong kind of evidence. CT is best understood in Woodward’s terms as a claim about the instability of certain causal dependencies across different background conditions. A recent distinction between evolution and ecology reveals what an adequate test of Lawton’s thesis would look like. To date, CT remains untested. But developments in genome-level ecology and molecular ecology point in promising directions.