Against Lawton’s Contingency Thesis; or, Why the Reported Demise of Community Ecology Is Greatly Exaggerated

Citation data:

Philosophy of Science, ISSN: 0031-8248, Vol: 82, Issue: 5, Page: 1104-1115

Publication Year:
2015
Usage 163
Downloads 111
Abstract Views 42
HTML Views 9
Link-outs 1
Captures 2
Exports-Saves 1
Readers 1
Social Media 2
Tweets 2
Citations 2
Citation Indexes 2
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/11845
DOI:
10.1086/684024
Author(s):
Stefan Linquist
Publisher(s):
University of Chicago Press
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
Lawton’s contingency thesis (CT) states that there are no useful generalizations (“laws”) at the level of ecological communities because these systems are especially prone to contingent historical events. I argue that this influential thesis has been grounded on the wrong kind of evidence. CT is best understood in Woodward’s (2010) terms as a claim about the instability of certain causal dependencies across different background conditions. A recent distinction between evolution and ecology reveals what an adequate test of Lawton’s thesis would look like. To date, CT remains untested. But developments in genome and molecular ecology point in a promising direction.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.