Prediction and typicality in multiverse cosmology

Citation data:

Classical and Quantum Gravity, ISSN: 0264-9381, Vol: 31, Issue: 3

Publication Year:
Usage 174
Downloads 135
Abstract Views 35
Link-outs 4
Captures 4
Readers 3
Exports-Saves 1
Citations 4
Citation Indexes 4
Repository URL:
Azhar, Feraz
IOP Publishing; Institute of Physics (IOP) Publishing Limited
Physics and Astronomy
article description
In the absence of a fundamental theory that precisely predicts values for observable parameters, anthropic reasoning attempts to constrain probability distributions over those parameters in order to facilitate the extraction of testable predictions. The utility of this approach has been vigorously debated of late, particularly in light of theories that claim we live in a multiverse, where parameters may take differing values in regions lying outside our observable horizon. Within this cosmological framework, we investigate the efficacy of top-down anthropic reasoning based on the weak anthropic principle. We argue contrary to recent claims that it is not clear one can either dispense with notions of typicality altogether or presume typicality, in comparing resulting probability distributions with observations. We show in a concrete, top-down setting related to dark matter, that assumptions about typicality can dramatically affect predictions, thereby providing a guide to how errors in reasoning regarding typicality translate to errors in the assessment of predictive power. We conjecture that this dependence on typicality is an integral feature of anthropic reasoning in broader cosmological contexts, and argue in favour of the explicit inclusion of measures of typicality in schemes invoking anthropic reasoning, with a view to extracting predictions from multiverse scenarios. © 2014 IOP Publishing Ltd.