Thinking about populations and races in time.

Citation data:

Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences, ISSN: 1879-2499, Vol: 52, Page: 5-11

Publication Year:
2015
Usage 216
Abstract Views 102
Downloads 90
Link-outs 24
Captures 19
Exports-Saves 11
Readers 8
Social Media 5
Tweets 4
Shares, Likes & Comments 1
Citations 6
Citation Indexes 6
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12061
PMID:
25765868
DOI:
10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.02.001
Author(s):
Millstein, Roberta L
Publisher(s):
Elsevier BV, Elsevier
Tags:
Arts and Humanities, Medicine
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
Biologists and philosophers have offered differing concepts of biological race. That is, they have offered different candidates for what a biological correlate of race might be; for example, races might be subspecies, clades, lineages, ecotypes, or genetic clusters. One thing that is striking about each of these proposals is that they all depend on a concept of population. Indeed, some authors have explicitly characterized races in terms of populations. However, including the concept of population into concepts of race raises three puzzles, all having to do with time. In this paper, I extend the causal interactionist population concept (CIPC) by introducing some simple assumptions about how to understand populations through time. These assumptions help to shed light on the three puzzles, and in the process show that if we want to understand races in terms of populations, we will need to revise our concept(s) of race.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.