Validating Animal Models

Citation data:

THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, ISSN: 0495-4548, Vol: 30, Issue: 2, Page: 163-181

Publication Year:
2015
Usage 384
Abstract Views 152
Full Text Views 130
Downloads 96
Link-outs 6
Captures 18
Exports-Saves 18
Social Media 44
Shares, Likes & Comments 42
Tweets 2
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12145
DOI:
10.1387/theoria.12761
Author(s):
Nina A. Atanasova
Publisher(s):
UPV/EHU Press, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea / Universidad del PaĆ­s Vasco
Tags:
Arts and Humanities
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
This paper responds to a recent challenge for the validity of extrapolation of neurobiological knowledge from laboratory animals to humans. According to this challenge, experimental neurobiology, and thus neuroscience, is in a state of crisis because the knowledge produced in different laboratories hardly generalizes from one laboratory to another. Presumably, this is so because neurobiological laboratories use simplified animal models of human conditions that differ across laboratories. By contrast, I argue that maintaining a multiplicity of experimental protocols and simple models is well justified. It fosters rather than precludes the validity of extrapolation of neurobiological knowledge. The discipline is thriving.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.