Symbolic versus Modelistic Elements in Scientific Modeling

Citation data:

THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, ISSN: 0495-4548, Vol: 30, Issue: 2, Page: 287-300

Publication Year:
2015
Usage 177
Downloads 100
Full Text Views 40
Abstract Views 37
Captures 3
Readers 2
Exports-Saves 1
Social Media 3
Tweets 3
Citations 2
Citation Indexes 2
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12151
DOI:
10.1387/theoria.12863
Author(s):
Liu, Chuang
Publisher(s):
UPV/EHU Press, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea / Universidad del PaĆ­s Vasco
Tags:
Arts and Humanities
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
In this paper, we argue that symbols are conventional vehicles whose chief function is denotation, while models are epistemic vehicles, and their chief function is to show what their targets are like in the relevant aspects. And we explain why this is incompatible with the deflationary view on scientific modeling. Although the same object may serve both functions, the two vehicles are conceptually distinct and most models employ both elements. With the clarification of this point we offer an alternative account to the deflationary view - the Hybrid Account; and we defend our account in contrast with deflationism.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.