Non-Representational Mathematical Realism

Citation data:

THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, ISSN: 0495-4548, Vol: 30, Issue: 3, Page: 331-348

Publication Year:
2015
Usage 263
Downloads 101
Abstract Views 79
HTML Views 79
Link-outs 4
Captures 4
Exports-Saves 4
Readers 0
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12155
DOI:
10.1387/theoria.14105
Author(s):
Maria Jose Frapolli
Publisher(s):
UPV/EHU Press, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea / Universidad del País Vasco
Tags:
Arts and Humanities
article description
This paper is an attempt to convince anti-realists that their correct intuitions against the metaphysical inflationism derived from some versions of mathematical realism do not force them to embrace non-standard, epistemic approaches to truth and existence. It is also an attempt to convince mathematical realists that they do not need to implement their perfectly sound and judicious intuitions with the anti-intuitive developments that render full-blown mathematical realism into a view which even Gödel considered objectionable (Gödel 1995, p. 150). I will argue for the following two theses: (i) that realism, in its standard characterization, is our default position, a position in agreement with our pre-theoretical intuitions and with the results of our best semantic theories, and (ii) that most of the metaphysical qualms usually related to it depends on a poor understanding of truth and existence as higher-order concepts.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.