Consciousness and Theory of Mind: a Common Theory?

Citation data:

THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, ISSN: 0495-4548, Vol: 31, Issue: 1, Page: 73-89

Publication Year:
2016
Usage 1355
Abstract Views 577
Full Text Views 535
Downloads 204
Link-outs 39
Captures 54
Exports-Saves 40
Readers 14
Social Media 70
Shares, Likes & Comments 67
Tweets 3
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12173
DOI:
10.1387/theoria.14091
Author(s):
Sebastián, Miguel Ángel
Publisher(s):
UPV/EHU Press, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea / Universidad del País Vasco
Tags:
Arts and Humanities
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
Many have argued that the difference between phenomenally conscious states and other kind of states lies in the implicit self-awareness that conscious states have. Higher-Order-Representationalist (HOR) theories attempt to explain such self-awareness by means of higher-order representation. Consciousness depends on our capacity to represent our own mental states: our Theory of Mind. It is generally agreed that such an ability can be decomposed into another two: mindreading and metacognition. I will argue that consciousness cannot depend on mindreading. The tenability of HOR theories depends, therefore, on the relation between mindreading and metacognition. I analyze several views on such a relation and argue that none of them seem to be a plausible option for HOR theories.

This article has 0 Wikipedia reference.