Another problem with RBN models of mechanisms

Citation data:

THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, ISSN: 0495-4548, Vol: 31, Issue: 2, Page: 177-188

Publication Year:
2016
Usage 76
Downloads 43
Abstract Views 18
Full Text Views 15
Captures 0
Readers 0
Social Media 1
Tweets 1
Citations 6
Citation Indexes 6
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12179
DOI:
10.1387/theoria.14502
Author(s):
Gebharter, Alexander
Publisher(s):
UPV/EHU Press, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea / Universidad del PaĆ­s Vasco
Tags:
Arts and Humanities
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
Casini, Illari, Russo, and Williamson (2011) suggest to model mechanisms by means of recursive Bayesian networks (RBNs) and Clarke, Leuridan, and Williamson (2014) extend their modeling approach to mechanisms featuring causal feedback. One of the main selling points of the RBN approach should be that it provides answers to questions concerning the effects of manipulation and control across the levels of a mechanism. In this paper I demonstrate that the method to compute the effects of interventions the authors mentioned endorse leads to absurd results under the additional assumption of faithfulness, which can be expected to hold for many RBN models of mechanisms.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.