The ontology of organisms: Mechanistic modules or patterned processes?

Citation data:

Biology & Philosophy, ISSN: 0169-3867, Vol: 31, Issue: 5, Page: 639-662

Publication Year:
2016
Usage 218
Downloads 175
Abstract Views 42
Link-outs 1
Captures 17
Readers 16
Exports-Saves 1
Mentions 1
News Mentions 1
Social Media 64
Shares, Likes & Comments 60
Tweets 4
Citations 1
Citation Indexes 1
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12240
DOI:
10.1007/s10539-016-9533-3
Author(s):
Christopher J. Austin
Publisher(s):
Springer Nature
Tags:
Arts and Humanities, Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
Most Recent News Mention
article description
Though the realm of biology has long been under the philosophical rule of the mechanistic magisterium, recent years have seen a surprisingly steady rise in the usurping prowess of process ontology. According to its proponents, theoretical advances in the contemporary science of evo-devo have afforded that ontology a particularly powerful claim to the throne: in that increasingly empirically confirmed discipline, emergently autonomous, higher-order entities are the reigning explanantia. If we are to accept the election of evo-devo as our best conceptualisation of the biological realm with metaphysical rigour, must we depose our mechanistic ontology for failing to properly “carve at the joints” of organisms? In this paper, I challenge the legitimacy of that claim: not only can the theoretical benefits offered by a process ontology be had without it, they cannot be sufficiently grounded without the metaphysical underpinning of the very mechanisms which processes purport to replace. The biological realm, I argue, remains one best understood as under the governance of mechanistic principles.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.