Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12253
Author(s):
Myrvold, Wayne C.
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
conference paper description
Once an experiment is done, the observations have been made and the data have been analyzed, what should scientists communicate to the world at large, and how should they do it? This, I will argue, is an intricate question, and one that philosophers can make a contribution to. I will illustrate these points by reference to the debate between Fisher and Neyman & Pearson in the 1950s, which I take to be, at heart, a debate about norms of scientific communication. I will argue that scientists need a richer set of tools for communicating epistemic states that may be very nuanced, and will point to way in which philosophers can contribute.

This conference paper has 0 Wikipedia mention.